Firma Kami Mewakili Empat Warga China yang Tidak Mengaku Bersalah atas Pertuduhan Menculik Lelaki Singapura di Pulau Pinang

Legal Representation

Dalam kes ini, Edward Ng & Partners bertindak sebagai peguam bela bagi Liu Ting Jun, salah seorang daripada empat tertuduh. Peguam Edward Ng mewakili Liu semasa prosiding di Mahkamah Sesyen Pulau Pinang, termasuk permohonan ikat jamin.

BALIK PULAU: Empat warga China, termasuk seorang wanita, didakwa di Mahkamah Sesyen Balik Pulau atas pertuduhan menculik seorang lelaki warga Singapura berusia 72 tahun bagi mendapatkan wang tebusan sebanyak SG$1 juta (kira-kira RM3.1 juta hingga RM3.2 juta).

Keempat-empat tertuduh, iaitu Liu Ting Jun, 46, Huang Jian, 39, Wang Hao Yu, 32, dan Guan Siqi, 24, mengaku tidak bersalah selepas pertuduhan dibacakan dalam bahasa Mandarin di hadapan Hakim Ahzal Fariz Ahmad Khairuddin.

Menurut pertuduhan, keempat-empat mereka didakwa bertindak bersama dua individu yang masih bebas serta dua lagi yang telah meninggal dunia untuk menculik dan melarikan secara salah seorang lelaki warga Singapura, Quek Aik Teng.

Kesalahan tersebut didakwa berlaku pada 26 Julai di Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Pulau Pinang (LTAPP), Bayan Lepas. Mangsa dipercayai menjadi sasaran bagi mendapatkan wang tebusan sebanyak SG$1 juta.

Kesemua tertuduh didakwa mengikut Seksyen 3(1) Akta Penculikan 1961, dibaca bersama Seksyen 34 Kanun Keseksaan. Jika disabitkan kesalahan, mereka berdepan hukuman penjara antara 30 hingga 40 tahun serta sebatan.

Kes dikendalikan oleh Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Ikmal Affendi Zulkifly. Liu Ting Jun diwakili peguam Edward Ng, manakala tiga lagi tertuduh, Huang Jian, Wang Hao Yu dan Guan Siqi, diwakili peguam Azizul Hilmi Zulkifli.

Dalam prosiding tersebut, pihak pembelaan memohon agar kesemua tertuduh dibenarkan diikat jamin. Edward Ng, yang mewakili Liu Ting Jun, memaklumkan bahawa anak guamnya telah memberikan kerjasama penuh kepada pihak polis sepanjang tempoh penahanan.

Beliau turut memberitahu mahkamah bahawa anak guamnya mempunyai seorang saudara jauh yang tinggal dan bekerja di Malaysia serta bersedia menjadi penjamin. Pihak pembelaan juga memaklumkan bahawa tertuduh tidak mempunyai rekod jenayah.

Bagi tiga tertuduh yang lain, Azizul Hilmi Zulkifli turut memohon jaminan dengan meminta mahkamah mengambil kira keadaan peribadi anak-anak guamnya. Beliau berkata kesemua tertuduh bersedia menyerahkan pasport, melaporkan diri secara berkala di balai polis serta tidak menghubungi mangsa atau saksi pendakwaan.

Pihak pembelaan turut menyatakan kesediaan untuk mematuhi apa-apa syarat tambahan yang ditetapkan oleh mahkamah sekiranya jaminan diberikan.

Bagaimanapun, pihak pendakwaan membantah permohonan jaminan tersebut dengan menegaskan bahawa pertuduhan yang dihadapi adalah serius dan melibatkan kepentingan awam. Pihak pendakwaan turut memaklumkan bahawa semakan terhadap pasport keempat-empat tertuduh masih dijalankan dan pengesahan daripada Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia masih belum diperoleh.

Selepas mendengar hujahan kedua-dua pihak, Hakim Ahzal Fariz Ahmad Khairuddin menolak permohonan jaminan terhadap keempat-empat tertuduh. Mereka kekal dalam tahanan dan tidak dibenarkan diikat jamin.

Mahkamah kemudian menetapkan 15 Oktober 2026 sebagai tarikh sebutan semula bagi tujuan penyerahan dokumen.

Kes ini dipercayai berkaitan dengan siasatan polis terhadap satu sindiket penculikan yang menyasarkan warga asing. Sebelum ini, polis dilaporkan telah menjalankan operasi di sebuah rumah di Taman Amira, Alor Setar, Kedah, susulan laporan kehilangan seorang lelaki warga Singapura.

Dalam operasi tersebut, dua suspek warga asing dilaporkan maut selepas berlaku kejadian berbalas tembakan dengan polis. Polis kemudian berjaya menyelamatkan seorang lelaki warga Singapura dan seorang wanita warga China yang dipercayai turut menjadi mangsa penculikan.

Siasatan awal dilaporkan mendapati mangsa lelaki tersebut telah tiba di Pulau Pinang pada 26 Julai sebelum hubungan dengan keluarganya terputus. Keluarganya kemudiannya menerima maklumat bahawa mangsa telah diculik dan permintaan wang tebusan sebanyak SG$1 juta telah dibuat.

Pihak keluarga dilaporkan telah membayar sebahagian daripada wang tebusan ketika rundingan dengan pihak yang dipercayai terlibat dalam penculikan tersebut.

Keempat-empat tertuduh telah mengaku tidak bersalah terhadap pertuduhan yang dikenakan dan kes tersebut masih dalam proses mahkamah.

Sumber:

  1. Sinar Harian

  2. Utusan Malaysia

  3. Kosmo!

  4. Berita RTM (Radio Televisyen Malaysia)

  5. Malaysia Tribune

Artikel Berkenaan

Firma Kami Mewakili Salah Seorang daripada Empat Warga China dalam Kes Penculikan Lelaki Singapura di Pulau Pinang

Firma Kami Mewakili Salah Seorang daripada Empat Warga China dalam Kes Penculikan Lelaki Singapura di Pulau Pinang

Empat warga China, termasuk seorang wanita, didakwa menculik lelaki Singapura berusia 72 tahun di Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Pulau Pinang. Kesemua tertuduh tidak mengaku bersalah, manakala mahkamah menolak permohonan ikat jamin dan menetapkan 15 Oktober 2026 untuk penyerahan dokumen.
本所代表四名中国籍被告涉绑架新加坡男子案在槟城面控

本所代表四名中国籍被告涉绑架新加坡男子案在槟城面控

四名中国籍嫌犯,包括一名女子,被控涉嫌在槟城国际机场绑架72岁新加坡男子,四人均不认罪。法庭拒绝所有保释申请,案件定于2026年10月15日提交文件。
Our firm represented in case for Four Chinese nationals who claim trial over kidnapping of Singaporean man in Penang

Our firm represented in case for Four Chinese nationals who claim trial over kidnapping of Singaporean man in Penang

Four Chinese nationals, including a woman, have claimed trial over the alleged kidnapping of a 72-year-old Singaporean man at Penang International Airport. The Penang Sessions Court denied bail to all four accused, with the case fixed for document submission on October 15, 2026.
It was only after receiving an inquiry letter from the BSK that I discovered the child I had raised for 12 years had suddenly become a Muslim

It was only after receiving an inquiry letter from the BSK that I discovered the child I had raised for 12 years had suddenly become a Muslim

A recent consultation from northern Malaysia involved a case concerning an investigation by the National Registration Department (JPN), specifically its investigation division, commonly referred to as BSK. The case highlights a serious issue that parents should understand: when a child’s birth registration is incorrectly recorded from the beginning, the consequences…
Can a Child Born in China (Foreign Country) Be Legally Adopted in Malaysia Without a Malaysian Birth Certificate?

Can a Child Born in China (Foreign Country) Be Legally Adopted in Malaysia Without a Malaysian Birth Certificate?

A Malaysian couple decided to formally adopt a girl born in China whom they had been caring for over a long period. However, when they hopefully applied to the Sessions Court for an adoption order, their application was rejected due to a procedural issue that appeared simple yet was highly…
She Raised the Child for 20 Years — So Why Did the Court Still Refuse the Adoption When He Was Nearly 19?

She Raised the Child for 20 Years — So Why Did the Court Still Refuse the Adoption When He Was Nearly 19?

A child had been raised by the same family since he was just one month old. He lived with them for a full twenty years, immersed in Chinese culture, customs, and family upbringing. To his adoptive mother, the boy was already family. However, when she finally decided to formally adopt…
His Father Was Malaysian and He Even Had a Malaysian Passport — So Why Was He Later Treated as a Non-Citizen?

His Father Was Malaysian and He Even Had a Malaysian Passport — So Why Was He Later Treated as a Non-Citizen?

A child was born at Ipoh General Hospital to a Malaysian father. He grew up receiving vaccinations and an education in Malaysia; he even obtained a Malaysian passport when he was just over a year old and used it to travel to Sarawak. However, when he was eight years old…
Raised for 12 Years, Then Told He Was Stateless When Applying for a MyKad: Does Adoption Automatically Give a Child Malaysian Citizenship?

Raised for 12 Years, Then Told He Was Stateless When Applying for a MyKad: Does Adoption Automatically Give a Child Malaysian Citizenship?

Imagine a couple who have devoted themselves to raising a child for 12 years, treating him as their own flesh and blood. It is only when the child turns 12 and prepares to apply for his MyKad at the National Registration Department (NRD) that the parents are suddenly informed of…
Abandoned at a Bus Station as a Young Child: Why Was She Still Unable to Become a Malaysian Citizen Nearly 30 Years Later?

Abandoned at a Bus Station as a Young Child: Why Was She Still Unable to Become a Malaysian Citizen Nearly 30 Years Later?

One of the most critical issues in this case is the girl’s exact age at the time she was discovered. Police reports estimated her age at approximately one and a half years, whereas subsequent medical assessments placed it at around one year. While this discrepancy might seem insignificant to the…
She Was Raised for 12 Years as a Malaysian Citizen — Why Was Her Citizenship Questioned When She Applied for a MyKad?

She Was Raised for 12 Years as a Malaysian Citizen — Why Was Her Citizenship Questioned When She Applied for a MyKad?

If a child grows up in Malaysia, holds a birth certificate bearing the word “Warganegara” (Citizen), and is raised by the same family for a full twelve years, the parents would naturally assume the child’s status is settled. However, this case reveals a startling reality: when the child applied for…
error: Content is protected !!
Welcome to Edward Ng & Partners! Click to consult with our lawyer! 欢迎来到爱德华·黄律师事务所,点击联系我们的律师
//
Lawyer Edward Ng 黄志威律师
Divorce, Child Adoption, Will, Probate & LA, CIPAA, Civil & Corporate Litigation, Debt Recovery, Defamation, Tax Law.
Consult Lawyer 咨询律师 상담문의